01 Overlap Assessment
We sampled and cross-referenced top-ranked wallets from four leading on-chain intelligence providers.
Auditing Popular Smart-Money Leaderboards
Sample overlap across leaderboards is modest; single-source dependence introduces blind spots.
Lee··18 分钟·Smart Money
Key findings
- Cross-examining four commercial smart-money leaderboards shows modest mutual overlap (28% - 62%).
- Methodological divergences in realized versus unrealized gains cause stark rankings disparities.
- Multi-source cross-verification is essential before deploying capital on external labels.
Sample Overlap Across Smart Money Leaderboards (Demo Data)
Sample overlap across leaderboards is modest; relying on a single list misses critical on-chain capital pools.
数据来源：LeeOnChain · Demo Data
02 Methodological Root Causes
Variance stems primarily from differing interpretations of unrealized versus closed PnL, gas fee inclusion, and wallet cluster attribution.
03 Recommendations
Analysts should avoid blind reliance on proprietary leaderboards and maintain open, reproducible evaluation criteria.